vNOTES surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma in overweight patients: a case series.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to show the feasibility and surgical outcome of vNOTES retroperitoneal dissection and isolation of sentinel lymph nodes in overweight and obese patients with endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients had undergone pelvic lymphadenectomy with a sentinel lymph node. Three patients were overweight, and one was obese with a BMI of 34.6 kg/m2. By using NMR mode sentinel lymph node was visualized, excised and marked separately for pathohistological analysis from the rest of the visualized lymph nodes that were then consecutively excised. RESULTS: The mean number of overall excised lymph nodes was 12.5, and the mean number on the right side was 5.75 and 6.25 on the left side. There were no metastases verified in the pathohistological evaluation. CONCLUSION: vNOTES retroperitoneal isolation of sentinel lymph nodes is good alternative and has its benefits, especially in overweight and obese patients with satisfying low intra- and postoperative complications.

Effects of high intraoperative inspired oxygen on postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of intraoperative inspired oxygen fractions (FIO(2)) of 0.8 and 0.5 when compared with standard FIO(2) of 0.3 in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. SETTING: General hospital, postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and gynecology floor room. PATIENTS: 120 ASA physical status I and II women, aged 21 to 76 years, undergoing elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive a gas mixture of 30% oxygen in air (FIO(2) = 0.3, Group G30), 50% oxygen in air (FIO(2) = 0.5, Group G50), or 80% oxygen in air (FIO(2) = 0.8, Group G80); there were 36 patients in each group. A standardized sevoflurane general anesthesia, postoperative pain management, and antiemetic regimen were used. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of nausea, vomiting, and both was assessed for early (0 to two hrs) and late PONV (two to 24 hrs), along with use of rescue antiemetic, degree of nausea, and severity of pain. MAIN RESULTS: There was no overall difference in the frequency of PONV at the early and late assessment periods among the three groups. G80 patients had significantly less vomiting than Group G30 at two hours, 3% (1/36) vs. 22% (8/36), respectively, P = 0.028. Nausea scores, rescue antiemetic use, pain scores, and opioid consumption did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSION: High intraoperative FIO(2) of 0.8 and FIO(2) of 0.5 do not prevent PONV in patients without antiemetic prophylaxis. An intraoperative FIO(2) of 0.8 has a beneficial effect on early vomiting only.